It used to
be, years ago, that those who had disabilities or were different in some way,
were categorized and named in ways that were insensitive, if not downright
cruel and hurtful. Gimp, cripple, harelip, lung (for TB sufferers), and many
more terms too improper to bother printing. Fortunately, that was then and this
is now.
These days there are forums and
other vehicles to discuss how these individuals would like to be called. In
these modern days we have an avenue to make it known how we would like to be
referred to in public. The internet allows for many voices to be heard. It is
important that those affected get involved or the terms chosen are still liable
to be inappropriate or offend.
The latest best term for those have
suffered a brain injury is "person with a brain injury." This is
preferable to 'brain injured person' because the emphasis should be on the
person, not the condition. The popular term "survivor" has problems
because it is too general. People survive a lot of things, someone whose cancer
is in remission is also called a survivor. We also need to avoid creating an
overly technical term like neurophysiometrically compromised, we don't want to
obfuscate brain injury the way I just did with this sentence, by using a word like
obfuscate.
I've been giving the term
"brain damaged" some thought. Although "brain damaged" is
technically accurate, it implies a permanent state, which of course it most
emphatically should not be viewed as. And yet at the same time, brain injury is
forever. I'm not ever going to be "not brain injured." Perhaps it is
more accurate to say that "brain injury" is an experience, "brain
damaged" is a state. The two are not incompatible, yet they are apples and
oranges.
Similarly, imagine if you had a
broken leg. Strictly speaking you are "leg damaged." Yet, no one ever
says that. Some still have an occasional limp that they will refer to as
"an old leg injury from a car accident." Maybe next time when I have
trouble word finding or following directions I'll explain it by saying "My
old brain injury is acting up again."
The phrase "person with a brain
injury" is more descriptive of an experience than a condition. When a
person's injury is relatively new they may justifiably resist this label as
their intention is to re-cover from it. That is why they go to re-hab. If they
are lucky, they may re-gain their former pre-injured state of being. That is a
really cool thing, if it happens to be your lot you lucky duck. For the rest of
us the journey is different. Once you experience something that changes your
life you can never go back and "un-experience" it. Just like you can
never un-mix the chocolate powder you just mixed into your milk to make hot
cocoa.
Nobody that has a brain injury wants
to have another. Although statistically, if you have a brain injury, you are
much more likely to suffer another, that is not from any personal desire.
However, those who have lived through something like that tend to feel they are
better for having made it. Basic training in the military is something that is
challenging and unpleasant, and yet anyone who has gone through it will be
proud of the fact they did it.
Which leads me to the final
conclusion for which I'm proud, inwardly, for having gone through what I have
gone through. Other things, even if they are more difficult to do now because
of my brain injury, I don't shy from doing. I am not a better person because of
my brain injury, but I am because of what I've done in spite of my having a
brain injury. I wouldn't choose to be this way, but as best as I can remember,
no one ever asked. The fact is, I suffered a severe brain injury in 1989. Ever
since then I have been crawling and struggling, fighting and groaning for every
inch, to get to where I am today. And I smile, sometimes I smile through my
tears, but I smile. I am here, and that is my victory.
No comments:
Post a Comment